Director, Epidemiology
Posted Sep 30, 2026 · We last checked this listing on Oct 6, 2026
Likely interview questions for this role
Written from this job description, not a generic list. Each one notes what the interviewer is really checking.
About your past
Tell me about a time your epidemiology work changed an asset strategy or regulatory outcome.
What they are checking: Whether their work has actually shaped strategy or regulatory outcomes, which shows they produce evidence that matters, not just publications.
Tell me about a time you managed or mentored others through a study.
What they are checking: Whether they can guide and develop others through complex study work, since director roles depend on building capability in the team.
How do you explain the limits of observational findings to non-epidemiologists?
What they are checking: Whether they can explain clearly what observational data can and cannot show, so non-specialists do not overstate or dismiss the findings.
What would you do
Clinical Development and Safety want different things from an RWE study. How do you align them?
What they are checking: Whether they can reconcile different functions' needs into one sound study, which requires influence and clear reasoning rather than authority.
A post-marketing requirement is due and the data source turns out to be weaker than planned. What do you do?
What they are checking: Whether they can respond to a weak data source under a regulatory deadline with sound options and early, honest communication with regulators.
About the work
How would you design a real-world study to characterize a safety signal for an immunology product?
What they are checking: Whether they can design a sound observational study around a specific safety question, choosing data, comparators and outcomes with care.
What real-world data sources would you consider for dermatology, and what are their limits?
What they are checking: Whether they know the strengths and limits of real-world data sources in this specialty, since poor data choices produce misleading safety findings.
How do you deal with confounding by indication in a non-interventional study?
What they are checking: Whether they can handle confounding by indication with sound methods like active comparators, which is central to credible real-world evidence.
How do you build an RWE strategy plan for an asset across its lifecycle?
What they are checking: Whether they plan evidence ahead across an asset's lifecycle, so the right data exists when regulators, payers and clinicians need it.
What FDA or EMA initiatives on real-world evidence are shaping your work?
What they are checking: Whether they follow how regulators are shaping real-world evidence standards, since those expectations decide what studies will actually be accepted.
What makes a strong protocol and SAP for a non-interventional study?
What they are checking: Whether they write protocols and analysis plans precise enough to stand up to regulatory review and prevent analysis choices made after the fact.
Practice this interview out loud.
Offer builds a real interview for this exact role at AbbVie from your resume and this job description, asks the questions one at a time, and tells you what landed. The first one is free.
Practice this out loudThe full job description
As published by AbbVie.